nvdaily.com link to home page
Home | Archive | Weather | Traffic
Subscribe | Guide to the Daily

News arrow City of Winchester arrow Frederick County arrow Traffic & Transportation

Print | Buy Photos | Get E-mail Alerts | Follow Us On Twitter | Visit Us On Facebook |
Star Click on headline to recommend this story | asterisk asterisk denotes breaking news

| 0 | 2 Comments

City mulls change to two-way plan

Safety panel's suggestion to keep Cameron Street partially one-way heading to council for approval

By J.R. Williams -- jrwilliams@nvdaily.com

WINCHESTER -- The City Council is considering changing its plan for a major intersection during its conversion of Cameron and Braddock streets to two-way traffic.

Safety concerns, plus an outcry from area business owners, have the city re-examining their original proposal for the intersection of Loudoun and Cameron streets.

The proposal approved by the City Council in April would have installed a median at the intersection, allowing southbound motorists from Martinsburg Pike (U.S. 11) to choose either road to continue south.

During a meeting of the council's Community Safety and Public Services Committee, city Public Services Director Perry Eisenach outlined a different plan: Keep Cameron Street one-way northbound from Oates Street to the intersection.

Members of the Community Safety and Public Services Committee voted Tuesday night to send the option to the City Council for approval, with a caveat to request proposals for an independent traffic study of the intersection.

Several options were initially considered, including re-aligning the intersection completely, installing a roundabout or adding a traffic signal.

The intersection was the "most challenging" to convert to two-way traffic, Eisenach said, but "our recommendation is driven by cost" in the end.

"As a set, we feel like this is the best approach," he said. "If it doesn't work, we can go back and change it."

A traffic signal would have cost between $175,000 and $200,000, he said. Installing the median as originally planned would cost about $30,000, with a roundabout running about $500,000. Costs to acquire additional land for those options also would have to be considered, he said.

The intersection is particularly cramped, with little room for turn lanes or other improvements.

Tom Gilpin, who owns Northside Lanes at the intersection and several nearby buildings, said the council needs an independent voice to help make sense of a tricky problem.

The original plan would not have allowed northbound motorists on Loudoun Street to continue through to Martinsburg Pike, pushing motorists into the bowling alley parking lot, he said.

"We need a traffic study to give [the] council alternatives," he said. "It's incredibly unsafe. We have a large number of pedestrians who are patrons of our business, including children."

Fred Hamilton, who owns Auto Recyclers LLC at 685 N. Loudoun St., said the new proposal makes sense.

"They cannot make a roundabout big enough" for trucks to come through the intersection, he said.

The conversion to two-way traffic is being completed in tandem with the city's downtown utility infrastructure improvements project.

Comments policy

Comments that are posted on nvdaily.com represent the opinion of the commenter and not the Northern Virginia Daily/nvdaily.com. Commenters agree to abide by our Comments Policy when posting. If you feel that a post is objectionable or does not adhere to our comments policy, please e-mail us at info@nvdaily.com.



How much more tax money is going to be wasted? Wonder what the cost of the two-way conversion has increased to now?

Did not the study beforehand bring up these issues?


These issues came up during the Public Comment period. The purpose of the public comment period is to allow issues such as this to be revealed. You should be thankful that we have the opportunity to provide our input during the planning stage, rather than just submitting complaints when decisions are made without any outside review. You are correct that it may result in additional expenditure of funds, but this may be in your best interests in the long run, and it is based on public input.

Leave a comment

What do you think?

(You may use HTML tags for style)

Recent Entries

Category Archives

News | Sports | Business | Lifestyle | Obituaries | Opinion | Multimedia| Entertainment | Homes | Classified
Guide to the Daily: Advertise | Circulation | Contact Us | NIE | Place a Classified | Privacy Policy | Subscribe

Copyright © The Northern Virginia Daily | nvdaily.com | 152 N. Holliday St., Strasburg, Va. 22657 | (800) 296-5137

The best small daily newspaper in Virginia