nvdaily.com link to home page

Traffic | Weather | Mobile Edition
Archives | Subscribe | Guide to the Daily

Local News arrow Big Picture arrow Environment arrow Local Government

| 0 | 5 Comments

Foundation: Bill to cost watershed $300M

View larger image

Two fishermen float on a raft along the Shenandoah River on Friday. A resolution to stop federal funding of the Chesapeake Bay watershed cleanup will be considered by the U.S. Senate. Rich Cooley/Daily

* Breaking News

If local news is breaking and you know about it:
* Call Us: 800-296-5137
* E-mail Us
* Upload Your Photos

Goodlatte's measure to cut federal funding from cleanup heads to Senate

By Preston Knight - pknight@nvdaily.com

More than $300 million in federal assistance to clean up the Chesapeake Bay watershed stands to be lost if the U.S. Senate passes an amendment championed by Sixth District Rep. Bob Goodlatte, according to a report released last week.

The House of Representatives passed a continuing resolution introduced by the local congressman in February that prohibits federal funding for the cleanup. In an interview before the vote, he said that the Environmental Protection Agency had no authority under federal law to demand that farmers and localities make major upgrades to fight pollution.

On Dec. 29, the EPA announced its "pollution diet," identifying the necessary reductions of nitrogen, phosphorus and sediment into the bay from Delaware, Maryland, New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia and Washington, D.C.

On Tuesday, the Chesapeake Bay Foundation released a memo that details the impact of Goodlatte's amendment. In it, Doug Siglin, the agency's federal affairs director, estimates that more than $300 million will not be disbursed toward cleanup efforts if the Senate sends the measure to President Obama as part of the government funding bill.

"This action would not only dramatically set back the ability of states, towns, cities, sanitation districts, farmers, landowners, and federal land managers to meet the agreed-upon targets for Chesapeake Bay watershed cleanup by 2017 and 2025, but also hamper efforts to clean up local rivers and streams," the memo states. "Ratepayers, farmers, landowners, and other citizens would pay a heavy price for the destruction of more than 25 years of cooperation and investment in cleaning up the waters that lead to the Chesapeake Bay."

On Feb. 19, following the passage of the resolution by a 230-195 vote, Goodlatte posted a statement on his website further explaining his position.

"EPA has proposed arbitrary limits on the amounts of nutrients that can enter the Chesapeake Bay, and how these nutrients enter the Bay," he states. "At the same time EPA is seeking to expand their regulatory authority by seizing authority granted to the states and converting the Bay Cleanup efforts to a process that is a top down approach with mandatory regulations."

Goodlatte writes that the "overzealous" regulations will impact everyone in the bay's watershed, and the "devastating" cost of compliance will result in billions of dollars in losses.

"The EPA's approach is far from the best approach to restore the Chesapeake Bay," he states.

Foundation spokesman Chuck Epes said in an e-mail that Goodlatte's amendment comes at a particularly difficult time for pollution, citing Virginia Department of Environmental Quality's recently updated impaired waters list that found 12,101 polluted stream miles out of 17,753 studied. In 2008, when the last report was conducted, the number of miles was 10,543 statewide, which was up from 9,002 two years prior, he said.

Before Goodlatte's proposal, the American Farm Bureau Federation sued EPA regarding the cleanup. Meanwhile, Shenandoah Riverkeeper Jeff Kelble has called the congressman's resolution "way out of step with Virginians and Americans."


"At the same time EPA is seeking to expand their regulatory authority by seizing authority granted to the states and converting the Bay Cleanup efforts to a process that is a top down approach with mandatory regulations." -Goodlatte-

Ummm, well, the Bay doesn't JUST belong to Virginia Congressman. Consequently the Federal Government has a right to do what it is attempting to do....

Bemoan the "top down" approach all you'd like, but it's pretty clear that this is the only approach that the state of Virginia will listen to.

Yes, this problem requires a solution at its source, which is primarily the western side of the state.

"The EPA's approach is far from the best approach to restore the Chesapeake Bay," -Goodlatte-

Here we go again.... Another "That's NOT the answer!!" from a Republican that isn't suggesting or offering his own solution... We're all ears Congressman!! What's YOUR plan?

Even people from the North Fork of the Shenandoah River admit that there is no proof where the pollution comes from. Assumption on phosphorus and nitrogen are simply guesses, and it's not right to impose the restriction without proof. Sorry Irishman, I agree with Mr. Goodlatte on this point.
This is not clean up from a spill or evil industry it is unknown how much these things are damaging the environment...and sediment is there. I'm all for planting water gardens or making developers leave some vegetation near large run off areas, but localities are the best people to decide this...not the EPA.
On the bright side, we're disagreeing again! ;)

Sorry Kim, obviously the localities are NOT the best people to decide this or it would already be done.

And seriously. There's no proof where excess nitrogen and phosporous is coming from? I guess there's no proof that acid rain came from industrial emissions either, but the coincidence is strong enough that we feel its safe to assume.


Irishman I didn't say we didn't know where the nitrogen and phosphorus come from, I said we didn't know what the pollution is...if it's at all. The river is supposedly wider, making the water warmer, which also causes excessive algea growth and possible fish death...just saying...love ya!

And as far as the budget stuff, I agree with you about use it or lose it. I think budgets should be made for what they need every year, or two years as it might be, and if there is left over then either save it or give it back. I've never understood use it or lose it. One of the biggest causes of fraud, waste and abuse in government.

Leave a comment

What do you think?

(You may use HTML tags for style)


Comments that are posted on nvdaily.com represent the opinion of the commenter and not the Northern Virginia Daily/nvdaily.com.

Comments that contain Web addresses, e-mail addresses, personal attacks, name-calling or personal information considered by the editor to be inappropriate for posting here will not be posted.

Commenters agree to abide by our COMMENTS POLICY when posting. Questions? E-mail us at info@nvdaily.com.


Local News Sections

2010: Year in Review Agriculture Apple Blossom Festival Basye Berryville Big Picture Bob Wooten Books Boyce Breaking News Business Business Spotlight City of Winchester Civil War Clarke County Cockfighting Case College Corrections Courthouse Notes Courts & Legal News Crime & Public Safety Economy and Jobs Edinburg Edward N. Bell Entertainment Entertainment Spotlight Environment Fall 2010 Farms Feature Photos Featured Festivals Financial Fire & Rescue Fort Valley Frederick County Front Royal General Assembly Hard Times Health History Holidays Homes In The Spotlight Jody Lynn Bradley Justin Shane Slater Ledger Legislation Library Livestock Local Government Local Markets Local Sports Matt Pallister Maurertown Media Middletown Military & Veterans Moms Mt. Jackson New Market New Market Fire Department Page County Pets & Animals Politics Power Line Quicksburg Religion School News Shenandoah County Shenandoah National Park Shenandoah University Solar Farm Staff Picks Star Tannery Stephens City Strasburg Swine Flu Technology The Year in Review Toms Brook Tourism Traffic & Transportation Upcoming Events Video In The Spotlight volunteer agencies Volunteer Rescue Squads Warren County Weather Woodstock

News | Sports | Business | Lifestyle | Obituaries | Opinion | Multimedia| Entertainment | Homes | Classifieds
Guide to the Daily: Advertise | Circulation | Contact Us | NIE | Place a Classified | Privacy Policy | Subscribe

Copyright © The Northern Virginia Daily | nvdaily.com | 152 N. Holliday St., Strasburg, Va. 22657 | (800) 296-5137

Best Small Daily Newspaper in Virginia!

nvdaily.com | seeshenandoah.com