nvdaily.com link to home page

Traffic | Weather | Mobile Edition
Archives | Subscribe | Guide to the Daily


Local News arrow Shenandoah County arrow Strasburg

| 0 | 5 Comments

Retention pond removal roils waters

Rex_Judson_.jpg
View larger image

Judson Rex


Official: Town's installation of drainage pipe across property violates numerous state regulations

By Sally Voth -- svoth@nvdaily.com

STRASBURG -- The town's removal of a stormwater retention pond in Madison Heights violates numerous state regulations, the Town Council was told this week.

Peter Trask, who said he is certified by the state as a "responsible land disturber," talked to the panel about the town's role in removing a retention pond at 622 Christiansen Drive and installing a drainage pipe across the property.

The pipe discharges onto Ralph Sine's property, releasing trash and eroding the land.

A memo from Town Manager Judson Rex to the Town Council and Mayor Tim Taylor says Madison Heights' developer had planned to remove the pond, but that never happened, and the landowners were concerned about the wet issues and safety.

"The town told them that if they would buy the pipe, [the] town would do away with the pond," Sine said in an interview last month. "In 2007, they connected this pipe to the storm drains and ran it over to my property and covered up the pond.

"It was never even brought before the town council. They just closed the pond, so they have created a disaster out there."

Trask said he suspected the destruction of the pond and piping of the discharge violated 10 regulations in the Department of Conservation and Recreation's Stormwater Management Enforcement Manual. Those violations carry fines.

Normally, those fines would be levied against the homeowner, Trask said, but the town did the work in this case.

"You've got a pretty egregious violation up there with reference to taking out the pond," he said.

Trask said he'd inspected the drainage pipe, and it's spewing out a considerable amount of sediment and trash. He said he wanted the Town Council to understand the severity of the issue. Had an average owner done what the town did, it could result in fines of tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of dollars, Trask said.

Rex and Assistant Town Manager Greg Martin suggested that the Town Council approve $5,000 to pay Lellock Consulting to design a new stormwater detention pond.

Councilman Justin Ritenour said he worried the $5,000 fee was "only the surface," of what the issue would cost the town.

Martin said the construction project range is expected to be $10,000-$30,000, but the final cost isn't known yet.

"This will get us to the next step," he said.

Councilman Bob Baker wanted to know where the town was as far as determining whether the land is designated as wetlands, as was discussed at a previous meeting, and what that designation might mean.

That is something Lellock would answer, Martin said. He said the firm recommended the town bring a solution to the drainage problem to the Army Corps of Engineers.
"But, are we going to be in compliance with the wetlands requirements if we do what we're doing?" Baker asked.

Martin said the consultants are aware of regulatory issues and those fall into the contract with the town.

"The uncertainty concerns me, which is why I'm hesitant to approve this now until maybe we learn a little bit more," Ritenour said.

Taylor said he thought some of the questions would be answered when the engineering work is done.

"We need to learn lessons even if it was a past administration [that approved draining the pond], so that this is not repeated," Councilman Scott Terndrup said.

When it came to a vote, the Town Council unanimously approved the $5,000 contract for design services.




5 Comments



The retention ponds I've seen around Strasburg are mostly mosquito hatcheries. They are all full of weeds and never drain completely. There is one at the high school, one on both sides of Rt. 11 at Hupps hill, and one at the new water plant. This is just a few I have come across.

The town of Woodstock has a very good looking storm drainage retention system. Very clean. Take a look and save our $5000.

If the original pond was designed and installed according to Virginia DCR standards, shouldn't there be engineer and as-built drawings already in existence? Why is the town paying $5,000 to design a pond that was already designed? Surely the developer still has the plans. Furthermore, isn't the developer partly or fully responsible for bringing the site into compliance with state regs?

The ponds aren't supposed to drain. The pond is designed to catch the water run-off and return it to the aquifer through seepage. The reason there is a need for these ponds is the development homes, paved roads and concrete drives halt a huge amount of water from returning to the groundwater table. The drain within the pond is only for overflow, so the banks aren't breached and eroded in a big storm.

I agree 100% with Ryank, why is the town spending $5000.00 town tax payers dollars to redesign something that should already exists. If the original is no longer around, for sure there should be a design for a retention pond somewhere in that town office.

If the ponds don't drain completely zillustdration, you have a wet land. Thats different, or maybe that is what Strasburg is striving for. Anyway, how can a retention pond be effective if it is always full of water.



Leave a comment

What do you think?

(You may use HTML tags for style)

Comments

Comments that are posted on nvdaily.com represent the opinion of the commenter and not the Northern Virginia Daily/nvdaily.com.

Comments that contain Web addresses, e-mail addresses, personal attacks, name-calling or personal information considered by the editor to be inappropriate for posting here will not be posted.

Commenters agree to abide by our COMMENTS POLICY when posting. Questions? E-mail us at info@nvdaily.com.












top-jobs-logo.jpg

Look Who 'Likes' nvdaily!



Daily readers: Click the "LIKE" button above to get Daily news and breaking news alerts on your Facebook page.

Activity & Recommendations

Local News Sections

Agriculture AP Wire Features Apple Blossom Festival Basye Berryville Bob Wooten Boyce Breaking News Business Charities Charles Pannunzio Civil War Clarke County Colleges Corrections Courthouse Notes: Permits, Transactions Courts & Legal News Crime & Public Safety Economy and Jobs Edinburg Edward N. Bell Entertainment Environment Fairs & Festivals Fire & Rescue Fort Valley Frederick County Front Royal Hard Times Health History Homes In The Spotlight Ledger Livestock Local Markets Maurertown Media Middletown Military & Veterans Moms Mt. Jackson New Market Page County Pets & Animals Politics Quicksburg Religion School News Shenandoah County Shenandoah Farms Volunteer Fire Department Star Tannery Stephens City Strasburg Toms Brook Traffic & Transportation Utilities Warren County Weather Winchester Woodstock




News | Sports | Business | Lifestyle | Obituaries | Opinion | Multimedia| Entertainment | Homes | Classifieds
Guide to the Daily: Advertise | Circulation | Contact Us | NIE | Place a Classified | Privacy Policy | Subscribe

Copyright © The Northern Virginia Daily | nvdaily.com | 152 N. Holliday St., Strasburg, Va. 22657 | (800) 296-5137

nvdaily.com
Best Small Daily Newspaper in Virginia!


nvdaily.com | seeshenandoah.com