nvdaily.com link to home page

Traffic | Weather | Mobile Edition
Archives | Subscribe

Opinion arrow Letters to the Editor

| 0 | 2 Comments

Letters to the Editor

Republican war against women


Last February, House Republicans voted to cut off funding to Planned Parenthood. Last May, they unanimously passed the "no Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act" banning the District of Columbia from funding abortions for low-income women. (The original version removed all exceptions - rape, incest, and endangerment to a mother's life - except "forcible" rape.)

Earlier this year, Republican legislators in Virginia, Pennsylvania, Idaho, and Alabama pushed bills requiring women seeking abortions to undergo invasive vaginal ultrasound tests (Pennsylvania Republicans even wanted proof the woman had viewed the images).

Republicans legislators in Texas have voted to eliminate funding for any woman's healthcare clinic with an affiliation to an abortion provider - even if the affiliation is merely a shared name, employee, or board member.

All told, over four hundred Republican bills are pending in state legislatures, attacking a woman's reproductive rights.

But even this doesn't seem enough to the GOP. Republicans in Wisconsin just repealed a law designed to prevent employers from discriminating against women.

Politicians who attack Planned Parenthood are willing to sacrifice 100 percent of healthy mothers who benefit from the services provided because 3 percent of the activity is related to abortion services. This is literally throwing the baby out with the bath water. It also allows the 3 percent tail to wag the 97 percent dog.

The Republicans are determined to dismantle the safety net protecting the old, the disabled, the low income and the unemployed. All this works disproportionately in an adverse way against women who on the average earn less than men and increasingly are the sole bread winner in their household.

The Republican attacks on birth control and family planning are direct attacks against women. Statistics show that women who lose control of the number of children they bear are most likely to be low income and to be impoverished. Most often these markers create obstacles to vocational and professional careers and negatively impact opportunities for advancement.
The Republican record clearly demonstrates that any woman who votes Republican is voting against herself, her daughters, and her granddaughters.

Warren D. Golightly, Winchester

Who is responsible for publication?


I am the kind of person who feels that if he has a comment to make, he does it with the recipient having the full knowledge of who made the comment. Only once in my lifetime (79 years) have I sent an anonymous letter. The reason for that was that I feared retaliation which might have affected many other people and not just me.

I received the publication "Shenandoah County Times" in the mail today. I could not find any information in it as to who or what organization had it composed, printed and mailed. Of course, it presents opposition to the regional jail. There is plenty of information on how to contact the members of the Shenandoah County Board of Supervisors, but not whoever is responsible for the publication.

Whoever is responsible should stand and be counted, so that any of us who disagree with their position can let them know how we feel. It seems we are dealing with a "Mystery Man" or "Mystery Organization" which is a little lacking in backbone.

Do you realize that our form of government is not exactly a "democracy"? Ours is a "representative" form, where people are elected to represent us on governing bodies. Therefore, we do not vote on matters, but have a representative to do that.

I feel the Shenandoah County Board of Supervisors have diligently studied the jail situation. I respect their judgment that building a regional jail is the best course of action.
Lonnie D. Goad, Strasburg

Yes! Change is possible


Can homosexuals change? Yes! In the same passage were Paul declares, that "homosexuals shall not inherit the kingdom of heaven," he says, "and such were some of you...." They were homosexuals, and a number of other things (1 Corinthians 6:9-11), but were no longer! God does not declare that an activity is a sin if there is no possibility of repenting of it. The Lord is "not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance" (2 Peter 3:9).

Those who claim that homosexuals are "born that way," and cannot change cite several studies that show there is a genetic, and other biological links, to homosexuality. But what is as important as what these studies show is what they don't show. They don't show that all people who have these predispositions are gay, all gay people have these predispositions, or that these are the only influences that contribute to homosexuality. 

What the researchers have said is that homosexuality is linked to a number of factors, including genetic, biologic and environmental factors. Michael Cash (May 18) makes reference to homosexual tendencies in animals. Animals must not be compared with humans. Humans, unlike animals, were created "in the image of God" (Genesis 1:27, 9:6). Animals do many things that most would consider totally unacceptable in humans.

Homosexuality is not a chosen behavior, any more than compulsive gambling, alcoholism, excessive compulsive disorder, etc. are chosen behaviors. But, those with those behaviors can, and often do, change.

In a two year study by the National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality (NARTH), 31 of the 84 studies showed a quantitative outcome of individuals able to change sexual orientation. These are not studies that merely speculate on the ability to change; they actually have the numbers to back it up! 

No one should be "bullied" into changing, but if one chooses to try to change, he should not be told he cannot change, and should be given every opportunity and encouragement to do so. A number of websites and books provide assistance in this regard.
L. John Bost, Strasburg


Mr. Golightly,

Republicans have not birth control and family planning. They have opposed tax payer funding of abortion, and forcing religious institutions, not just Catholics, to pay for anything they are religiously opposed to. The reason they oppose funding of Planned Parenthood is because many, perhaps most, Americans don't want their tax dollars to pay for abortions. Planned Parenthood will survive without taxpayer funding. When it stops supporting an paying for abortions, perhaps the Republicans, and many Democrats will reconsider funding.

Mr. Bost, you should rush right over to Dick Cheney's house and offer your remedial counseling service to his homosexual daughter, Liz Cheney, and relieve her of all that self-inflicted confusion because she decided on making a free choice in lieu of a destiny ordained by genetic inevitability. Who knows how many years Dick has suffered the indignity of having a homosexual daughter in the family? So, you suppose she chose to become a homosexual? I'll bet she would tell you if you asked her. But, beware of angry fathers... Cheney is known to have shotgunned people in the face for nothing.... and you're doing something best left to crackpots. You're not a crackpot, are you?

Yes, Mr. Bost, change is possible. You could change if you wanted to, right? Have you ever let your mind wander into a dangerous area and had a secret impure thought of being naked in the arms of another naked man? Now that I have painted you that picture, just try not to think about it. Did I just make you think about it? Don't think about it. Don't... think...... think about it.

Change is a two-way street, wouldn't you agree Mr. Bost? If homosexuals can snap a finger and change, why couldn't a heterosexual snap a finger and change to homosexuality just as easily?

If, as you suggest, homosexuals can easily and voluntarily change their sexual preferences, somehow, I can imagine you changing over to the dark side, thoroughly (and voluntarily) enjoying your transformation.

Bon app├ętit.



Leave a comment

What do you think?

(You may use HTML tags for style)


Comments that are posted on nvdaily.com represent the opinion of the commenter and not the Northern Virginia Daily/nvdaily.com. If you feel that a comment is objectionable, please click on the Report Abuse link above. We will review the reported comment and make a decision on deleting it if we feel that it contains inappropriate content.


Opinion Sections

Carolyn Long Editorial Cartoons Editorials Jules Witcover Leonard Pitts Jr. Letters to the Editor Linda Ash Mary Sanchez Paul Greenberg Reader Commentary

News | Sports | Business | Lifestyle | Obituaries | Opinion | Multimedia| Entertainment | Homes | Classifieds
Contact Us | NIE | Place a Classified | Privacy Policy | Subscribe

Copyright © The Northern Virginia Daily | nvdaily.com | 152 N. Holliday St., Strasburg, Va. 22657 | (800) 296-5137

Best Small Daily Newspaper in Virginia!

nvdaily.com | seeshenandoah.com