Editorial: Congress should OK mental health legislation
While President Barack Obama and most members of Congress have seemed preoccupied with proposals for new limits on gun ownership since the school massacre in Newtown, Conn., not much has been said about getting to the root causes of such horror — insanity and the evil that sometimes drives it.
Last week, Americans were reminded forcefully of the need to refocus the national debate. Bombs were exploded during the Boston Marathon, killing three people and wounding more than 170 others. Police said two young men, ethnic Chechnyans from Russia, committed the horrific act. Both had lived in the United States for nearly a decade.
Last Thursday, before that was known, Rep. David McKinley, R-W.Va., and Rep. Marcy Kaptur, D-Ohio, introduced an important — nay, a critical — bill in the House of Representatives.
McKinley and Kaptur are calling for a comprehensive study of mental health care in the United States. “With the recent violent acts perpetrated by individuals suffering from mental illness, it is becoming ever more apparent that Americans struggling with mental illness are falling through the cracks,” McKinley explained.
A clear link exists between mental illness and many mass murders. Adam Lanza, the young man who massacred children and educators in Newtown, was known to have had some mental health problems.
But what of the Boston murderers? At this writing, why they engaged in wholesale slaughter was not known. Family members and others who knew them were at a loss to explain.
Something instilled a viciousness beyond most of our imaginations in them. One of the killers was videotaped placing a bomb beside the 8-year-old child who was one of three people killed in the blasts.
What contorts a human mind to the extent such evil is possible? Can such a conversion be spotted and treated?
It may be the killers, in their own minds, thought their act was justified for religious and/or political reasons. What we call brainwashing by cults — and that is what some terrorist organizations amount to — is not uncommon. It has been studied exhaustively. And by any reasonable view, susceptibility to it is a sort of mental derangement.
Of course, those who with cold calculation drive others to terroristic acts — while doing all they can to stay out of danger themselves — are not mentally ill. They are evil.
But most acts of terrorism are not committed by leaders, but instead by followers. What is it about some people that makes them engage in brutality at the behest, either overt or perhaps only imagined, of others?
This is not a philosophical question. Again, anyone capable of doing what the Boston bombers did is mental ill, by the yardstick nearly all of us employ.
So McKinley and Kaptur are right: We Americans need to take a hard, impartial and comprehensive look at mental illness, including how we identify it and how we treat it. Answers we may be able to find there will save more lives than new controls on firearms.
Both the House and Senate should approve the McKinley-Kaptur bill immediately.