Diane Dimond: America: The world’s No. 1 jailer

Diane Dimond

Let’s talk about the U.S. prison system, shall we? By that I mean the whole shebang: prisons run by the federal government, state jails, local jails and juvenile correctional institutions. And let’s toss in immigration detention facilities, military prisons and the 76 jails on Native American lands.

All together, the United States of America’s criminal justice system imprisons more than 2.3 million, according to the Prison Policy Initiative, or PPI. The organization undertook the massive job of pulling together all the far-flung statistics from incarceration facilities all across the country. This unruly behemoth of a system costs U.S. taxpayers $80 billion each year.

Let that sink in. Eighty billion dollars each year. With that in mind, is it too much to wonder whether all that taxpayer money is being spent wisely?

America accounts for almost 5 percent of the planet’s population, but we have about 25 percent of the world’s prisoners. That’s more than any other developed country in the world. So what’s the deal? Is our country so full of dangerous criminals who must be locked up to keep the rest of us safe? Or might we be doing something wrong?

I’m going with the latter.

First, realize that a substantial number of people — about 443,000, according to PPI — are held in local jails although they have not been convicted of a crime. They are there because they couldn’t scrape up bail money. Surely, some of these inmates are guilty. But if a judge decided they could be released on bail, their alleged crime was presumably not that serious. Some are held on charges as minor as driving with an invalid license or failing to identify oneself to an officer. Poorer citizens can languish behind bars for days, months and even years waiting for trial.

In one heart-wrenching case, 16-year-old Kalief Browder was held at New York’s infamous Rikers Island for three years on charges of stealing a backpack. The teen spent almost two of those years in solitary confinement. He was ultimately released after prosecutors lost track of their eyewitness and dropped the case. Once free, Browder earned his high school diploma and then, unable to cope, committed suicide.

Holding hundreds of thousands of people in jail while they await trial not only reeks of being unconstitutional but also goes against the legal tenet of being innocent until proven guilty. It leaves families in tatters, forces spouses on to welfare and makes it hard for the accused to find work due to their record of incarceration. And it socks taxpayers with a huge bill for prisoners’ room and board.

I say it’s time to develop a system that swiftly and surely punishes those who fail to show up for trial instead of assuming no one will show unless they have money on the line. If they don’t have money for bail, it’s unlikely they’ll skip the state.

In addition, we’ve got to acknowledge that people with mental illness do not belong in jails or prisons. It’s hard to pinpoint exactly how many of these citizens are currently behind bars, but the best estimates indicate there are at least 356,000 prisoners in jails and state prisons who should be in a mental institution. Guards have no training to deal with such prisoners, and they pose a definite danger to themselves and others.

Then there are those serving extraordinarily long federal prison sentences for nonviolent drug-related crimes. Three-strikes laws and mandatory sentencing guidelines even resulted in low-level drug offenders being sentenced to life in prison because they already had a police record. Former President Obama began a program to free those who had shown themselves to be model prisoners, but thousands more remain locked up within our $80 billion incarceration industry.

Last December, Time Magazine reported the results of a three-year review of the system with an eye toward figuring out how many Americans are unnecessarily imprisoned. While some of the calculations could be seen as subjective, Time’s criminologists, lawyers and statistical researchers came to an astounding conclusion.

“We found that approximately 39 percent of the nationwide prison population (576,000 people) is behind bars with little public safety rationale,” they wrote.

So how much money could we save if all those inmates identified as safely releasable were allowed to go home? According to the study, “$20 billion annually, enough to employ 270,000 new police officers, 360,000 probation officers, or 327,000 school teachers.” I encourage you to read the full report.

One more point from me, your common-sense columnist who has never been soft on crime: As America’s crime rates have steadily gone down, the prison population has continued to go up. How could that be? As explained above, it’s too many in lockup awaiting trial, too many inmates with mental illness and too many prisoners serving sentences we now realize were draconian to begin with.

Have we really been controlling public safety with the current incarceration system, or has the ever-more-bloated corrections system taken control of us?

I’m going with the latter.

To find out more about Diane Dimond, visit her website at www.dianedimond.com. Her latest book, “Thinking Outside the Crime and Justice Box,” is available on Amazon.com. 

COMMENTS